CRTC listening to makes large streamers argue that they must now not have canadian subject material legal responsibility

A group representing major foreign streaming companies on Friday told a hearing organized by Canada’s Broadcasting Regulatory that those companies should not be expected to fulfill the same responsibilities of traditional broadcasters for Canadian content.

Motion Picture Association-Canada, which represents large streamers such as Netflix, Paramount, Disney and Amazon, said the regulator should be flexible to modernize its definition of Canadian content.

The Canadian Radio-TeliVization and Telecom Commission (CRTC) is holding a two-week public hearing on a new definition of Canadian materials that began on Wednesday. The proceedings are part of your work to implement the online streaming act – and it is bringing tension in the open between traditional players and large foreign streams.

In a written copy of the statement being made at the hearing, MPA-Canada argued the online streaming act, which updated the broadcast laws to catch online platforms, set a low standard for foreign online services.

Cancan funding debate

The group said in its initial comments, “The contribution of the applied to Canadian broadcasters is very high and reflects their existing obligations.”

“This difference was made intentionally because Parliament rejected the call to implement the same standard as ‘it’s not only realistic’ to expect foreign online undertakings working in a global market to contribute just like Canadian broadcasters.”

MPA-Canada said that CRTC should not implement any compulsory positions, functions or elements of ‘Canadian program “on global streaming services.

While the hearing focuses on the definition of Canadian content, the CRTC has also heard the debate about the financial contribution.

Earlier on Friday, Canadian media company Chorus urged the CRTC to pay the same amount to traditional broadcasters and online players in the Canadian material system. Broadcaster, who owns Global TV, said that both should contribute 20 percent of their revenue towards Canadian content.

Currently, large English-language broadcasters should contribute 30 percent of revenue to Canadian programming, and CRTC last year ordered streaming services dedicated to the funds dedicated to the production of Canadian content to pay five percent of its annual Canadian revenue.

Foreign streaming services are fighting that rule in court and Netflix, Paramount and Apple out of CRTC hearing earlier this week.

MPA-Canada stated that online services should be allowed to fulfill their obligations through direct expenditure on production where it is in line with their business model-not forced to pay in wealth or in a program acquisition model that is incompatible with the operation of their services. “

CRTC has released an initial status on the definition of Canadian material, suggesting whether to keep the current system to determine whether the material is considered to be Canadian by rewarding the points when Canadians occupy the major creative positions in one production.

CRTC is considering expanding the system to allow more creative positions to be counted towards total points. One of the subjects of debate in the hearing is the position of “Shorner”, which has become more important in recent years.

MPA-Canada said that “adding only a few posts to the list more than 40 years old is ignored today’s modern production scenario.”