
Premier Doug Ford warned Ontario scientists to do medical examination on dogs, ‘I stay before catching you’
Premier Doug Ford warned Ontario scientists who use cats and dogs in research experiments that they would “hunt” them to finish such work.
Ford stated that it was unacceptable for beagles in the Cardiac Test approved by London Research Institute in London and St. Joseph Health Care London, and promised to introduce laws to ban testing on some animals.
Ford said at a news conference in Windsor on Tuesday, “I understand mice, mice, you know, perhaps a rabbit, but these poor little beals – you just look at their face.”
Comments are related to an article released last week Discovery bureau Dalla Lana of the University of Toronto at the School of Public Health, which revealed that dogs were used in heart studies for years.
According to an article published in partnership with Postmaidia, researchers were inspiring a three -hour heart attack in dogs and puppies and removing them for further studies.
Ford said on Tuesday, “I have now instructed our team to start hunting someone else to do research on dogs or cats.” “This is just unacceptable. Imagine your little dog and they try to have a heart attack. Poor thing. It is terrible and inhuman.”
The research was kept in wrapped, but once the story was published, the hospital CEO Roy Butler wrote to the employees promising more transparency. He said that this work was approved by the Internal Animal Ethics Committee which follows Canadian Animal Welfare Guidelines.
Butler’s statement said, “Animal research in Lawson is highly regulated and is done only when scientifically necessary and all other options are considered,” Butler’s statement said.
On Monday, St. Joseph Health Care London said that it Research will “stop immediate” research To include dogs.
CBC News has made several requests for an interview but the hospital has declined.
Ford’s office has not responded to questions about whether it has ordered to terminate the cardiac test directly, but the premiere’s comments suggested the same on Tuesday.
“And just a message: If you are doing this with dogs or cats, you stop before catching you. Simple.
About 17,000 dogs used for science in 2023
According to the Canadian Council on Animal Care (CCAC), which develops standards for animal moral use and care in science, 16,151 dogs were used in research in 2023, the most recent figures are available.
The council, which also participates on the morality review panel for research approval, stated that the decisions on animal use are directed by “three RS”: replacement, lack and refinement.
“Is there any alternative method? If yes, you should not use an animal. Lack, ‘Do you need to use that quantity of animals to do research?” CCAC Executive Director Pierre Veriott said.
The purpose of purification theory is to reduce pain and crisis, if possible, using pain medicine and giving the animal relaxed.
Charu Chandrasekera, Executive Director of Canadian Center for Alternatives for Animal Methods, previously worked in a laboratory, studying heart failure using animals.
Chandrashekera said that she is thrilled Ford is speaking.

She is advocating the law that guides medical research using animals and believes that scientists have become decent while looking for alternative options.
“We do not have federal laws to protect animals in science. We do not have a federal animal welfare Act. We do not have many things that other countries do, and people always ask me, ‘Why don’t Canadians take care of people?” Chandrashekera said.
“This is a decisive moment for science in our country, and hopefully we can show the world that Canadians plan to phase out animal testing and take care to adopt more and more animal-free methods.”
Ford commented on finishing to use dogs in research, reaching one of Canada’s largest medical research organizations for CBC comments.
A public research and teaching network in Toronto, University Health Network (UHN) said it does not study dogs or cats.
“We are committed to the highest moral standards of animal care and use for the purpose of continuous progress in the field of human medicine,” the UHN spokesman said in an email. “The use of animals in research has been essential for life science, medicine and progress in agriculture, and consequently there is huge benefit to human and animal health. We continue to detect alternative approaches to reduce and change animals where possible.
The release said, “Any research associated with animal model is conducted under a rigorous moral and regulatory structure, which is accompanied by a protocol aligning with national and international regulatory bodies.”