Google Chrome can keep, but need to leave some data, Judge Rules in no confidence case

A federal judge on Tuesday ordered a shakeup of Google’s search engine in an attempt to curb the power of an illegal monopoly, but spared it by orders to break the company and other sanctions.

In the decision of the 226-Page made by the US District Judge Amit Mehta at Washington, DC, the technical scenario will be likely to be provoked by successes in artificial intelligence-in which the interaction is being tried as a long defeat as Google’s main gate as “North Engine” such as “North Engine” such as the main gate of Google.

“Unlike the specific case where the court’s job is to resolve a dispute based on historical facts, the court is asked to stare at a crystal ball and look towards the future. At all, not the fort of the judge,” Mehta wrote.

Judge is trying to rein in Google by banning some strategies used to run traffic for search engines and other services. Some prized database of the ruling company will also open about the information that is closely guarded about the search habits, which has provided an unsafe benefit to Google that appears to Google.

Google also has contracts that give their search engine, Mithun AI app, Play Store for Android and Virtual Assistant a special position on some devices. It gives some special contracts with the ruling device manufacturers and browser developers, but Mehta has stopped banning these multiple dollars deals that have been built to lock the smartphone, individual computers and other devices in Google years as defaults on their search engine.

The judge also dismissed the US justice department’s attempt to force Google to sell his popular Chrome browser, concluding that it was an inappropriate step that “would be incredibly messed up and highly risky.”

Mehta avoided ordering the sale of Chrome, as he decided that there is not enough evidence that the browser serves as an essential component in Google’s search monopoly, allowing a partition “a bad fit for this case”.

Chrome would have been a hot commodity, forcing the judge to place Google on the auction block. Perplexity presented an unwanted $ 34.5 billion to buy chrome last month. And during the court testimony earlier this year, an executive of a Chatgpt left no doubt that the owner of the service, Openai, would also be interested in buying chrome.

Partly because he is allowing the default deals to continue, Mehta is ordering Google to reach his current and rivals to reach the secret chutney of his search engine-Detta was stocked with trillions with trillions, which was used to help improve the quality of its search results.

It is a solution that Google also opposed fiercely, it is unfair that it is unfair and will take possession and security risk for billions who have questioned its search engine, sometimes delays sensitive issues.

Mehta’s decision will limit access to Google’s search index and query history.

AI Search Increase Quests

Mehta’s decision was an indication for the efforts of regulators to level the playground for companies that have invested billions to promote their AI business – the contestants would possibly be promoted from the ruling.

Mehta wrote in his judgment, “Jenai’s emergence changed the syllabus of the case.”

He said that tens of million people use generative AI chatbott such as chat, perplexity, and Cloud, which they were first sought through regular internet discoveries.

Although these chatbots are not yet close to change traditional discovery, the industry hopes that developers will continue to add features to GNAI products to perform more like Google Search.

The CEO of the alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai expressed concern during the test in April that data-sharing measures sought by the US Department of Justice could enable Google’s rivals to reverse their technology.

Win for justice department, other technical companies

GAIL Slater, the antitrust head of the Department of Justice, decided the verdict as “a major win for American”, even if the agency did not find everything he had sought. Slater wrote, “Now we are weighing our options and wondering what the order given is far away,” Post,

In his own post, Google implicated Mehta’s decision as a vengeance of his long -held position, which should never be brought. The decision “The industry has been changed through the arrival of AI, assuming which is giving people a lot of ways to find information,” Written by the vice-president of the regulatory matters of Lee-Ani Mulholland, Google.

“It outlines what we are saying because the matter was filed in 2020: competition is intense and people can easily choose services they want.”

Mountain View, California, the company has already vowed to appeal the monopoly conclusions of the judge issued 13 months ago, which ruled on Tuesday.

Investors seemed to be to explain the ruling as a relatively light slap on the wrist to Google, as its corporate parents, the stock value of the alphabet ink increased the extended trade by more than seven percent. If on Wednesday regular trading sessions follow a uniform trajectory, it will translate the market value of the alphabet to about $ 200 billion.

The default search deals exceed only one win for Google to continue. It is also a win for Apple, which receives more than $ 20 billion annually from Google, and other recipients of payment.

At the hearing earlier this year, Apple warned the judge that the company would be denied the money by banning the contracts to get funny in its own innovative research. Cupertino, California, the company also warned that the ban Google could have unexpected results of making the money more powerful that was spending it on deals, while most consumers would still end anyway in Google’s search engine.

Others, such as the owners of the Firefox search engine, said that losing Google contracts would threaten their future existence by depriving them of the necessary revenue.

Apple’s shares increased by three percent in extended trading after being ruling.

While Mehta’s decision continues to conquer, Google is facing another potential weak threat in another antitrust case targeting the Digital Advertising Empire by the Department of Justice that was built around its search engine.

A separate federal judge in Virginia announced that some technology has planned to be an illegal monopoly to the AD network earlier this year, the Department of Justice is planning to make a case for another proposed breakup in the test starting later this month.